D’Arcy Norman points out that publishing content in iTunes U is better than not publishing it at all, and that in the end Apple doesn’t own exclusive rights to the content, so institutions are free to put the content up in any other way they want and in any format they want.
I respect D’Arcy, and I wouldn’t accuse him of being an Apple apologist. In fact, the non-exclusive nature of the deal is one of the arguments the team from Michigan offered at EDUCAUSE when I asked them about the dental school project. It’s a key point. Nevertheless, I stand by my alarm, and ask that skeptics peruse (again) the iTunes U announcement page. This is a commercial venture with clear designs on vendor lock-in. (As Jon Udell has noted, iTunes is a podcatcher with an axe to grind.) If we lock ourselves in voluntarily because the deal (for now) is so sweet–school logos and colors on the front page, volume discounts on music, revenue opportunities, cool factor–we’re still locked in. This is the path of least resistance. Higher education should be stronger than that. I expect Apple is gambling that we are not. And once we’re on that path, we will only get weaker.
Much of the buzz I see on Technorati about iTunes U is how cool and easy it is, how our development woes are over, how our work has been done for us. Will institutions, especially starved-for-cash public schools, be willing to fund home-grown open alternatives when they can make money on a home-branded, outsourced, turn-key operation like Apple’s? I doubt it. Apple doesn’t need de jure exclusive rights. We’ll essentially give them away, de facto. Much better PR that way, and the company gets to express its astonishment at any dissent, for after all no one forced us to put all our content in iTunes U.
I don’t mind persuasion, but coercion is another matter, and coercion takes many forms.
Perhaps Apple’s reasoning goes like this. Apple believes that they are in the best position to empower education. Therefore, what’s good for Apple is good for education. Q.E.D.
I remain unconvinced.
Pingback: And He Blogs » Blog Archive » What Do You Think of Apple?
Several quick, grim thoughts in haste:
-Will Apple apply the “report a content/copyright violation here” button to content downloaded through iTunes U, that it already attaches to podcasts? If so, will be learn what happens to those reports, and what actions follow?
-How will iTunes U structure enabling and blocking access to one campus’ content from other campuses?
-How does this compare with other Web-based, free, rich media hosting services, such as OurMedia (full disclosure: I’m on that group’s board)?
-There *is* an impact on campus IT, and it’s not a good idea to skip it. First, if iTunesU consumption takes off on a campus, there will be increased demands for storage and bandwidth. Moreover, despite the ancient claim of Apple products being so easy that manual aren’t needed, how many IT hours will be spent showing people how to navigate the interface, answering file formatting questions (cf Brian Lamb and D’Arcy on this), and above all setting up the physical, network, and training necessary for increased rich media (video ain’t easy, folks) production?
For ourselves, how come academia hasn’t come up with this on our own? (Discuss. Bluebooks will be collected at the end of the hour)
Pingback: Tama’s eLearning Blog » Blog Archive » iTunes U … The Saga Continues
Mr. Udell’s article is sad from the standpoint of journalistic integrity. I would say that Mr. Udell has not checked the facts. After reading the article (more of a rant than journalism) I downloaded some of the Stanford content. I found that I was able to play the content in another player, contrary to his claim. That fact and his ability to re-encode the content would also refute is claim that Apple’s DRM was applied to the file. If the player that Mr. Udell uses supports standards like MP3, and MP4 he should have no problem playing the files. My guess is his uber lightweight MuVo (iPod Mini would also be a good choice) does not support all the Standards, does it.
Pingback: Gardner Writes » Blog Archive » iTunes U: the debate continues
Pingback: Endless Hybrids » Blog Archive » Podcasting Courses, iTunes U & Technology Planning